<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>评论：微软专用CRC工具 - CRC Verification Utility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/</link>
	<description>AppLife.Net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:22:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>来自：哇哈哈</title>
		<link>http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-12625</link>
		<dc:creator>哇哈哈</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-12625</guid>
		<description>我找了很久啦，谢谢</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我找了很久啦，谢谢</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>来自：MoontoC</title>
		<link>http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2372</link>
		<dc:creator>MoontoC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 04:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2372</guid>
		<description>实际上这是早期MS的做法,而且只持续了几年而已,只有少量的CD支持这个功能,而到了DVD时代,MS已经完全抛弃了这个做法,MS做过声卡,做过游戏机,做过游戏,上个世纪微软就已经做过比半条命引擎更优秀的尝试,但是由于当时机器能力所限,加上MS并不看好这块不赚钱的地面,所以只能算是实验作,MS一直都在尝试所有类型的东西,这个CRC实际上并不能算是真的CRC,只用来校验自家东西,也算是MS的习作之一</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>实际上这是早期MS的做法,而且只持续了几年而已,只有少量的CD支持这个功能,而到了DVD时代,MS已经完全抛弃了这个做法,MS做过声卡,做过游戏机,做过游戏,上个世纪微软就已经做过比半条命引擎更优秀的尝试,但是由于当时机器能力所限,加上MS并不看好这块不赚钱的地面,所以只能算是实验作,MS一直都在尝试所有类型的东西,这个CRC实际上并不能算是真的CRC,只用来校验自家东西,也算是MS的习作之一</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>来自：Chada</title>
		<link>http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2224</link>
		<dc:creator>Chada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2224</guid>
		<description>微软的算盘...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>微软的算盘...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>来自：Yacca</title>
		<link>http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2223</link>
		<dc:creator>Yacca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2223</guid>
		<description>我和睡到自然醒一样  不明白  纯支持了...最近走动的少</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我和睡到自然醒一样  不明白  纯支持了...最近走动的少</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>来自：Black-Xstar</title>
		<link>http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2216</link>
		<dc:creator>Black-Xstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2216</guid>
		<description>@xiaobao, 这个……我也不知道微软怎么想的……</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@xiaobao, 这个……我也不知道微软怎么想的……</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>来自：Black-Xstar</title>
		<link>http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2215</link>
		<dc:creator>Black-Xstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2215</guid>
		<description>@ZH CEXO, 微软MSDN目前只提供SHA1的。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ZH CEXO, 微软MSDN目前只提供SHA1的。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>来自：睡到自然醒blog</title>
		<link>http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2213</link>
		<dc:creator>睡到自然醒blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2213</guid>
		<description>纯粹看不懂了，都不敢留言了 :oops:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>纯粹看不懂了，都不敢留言了 <img src='http://applife.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_redface.gif' alt=':oops:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>来自：ZH CEXO</title>
		<link>http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2212</link>
		<dc:creator>ZH CEXO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2212</guid>
		<description>@Black-Xstar, 我一般还是对比的MD5，其他的没想过~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Black-Xstar, 我一般还是对比的MD5，其他的没想过~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>来自：网络</title>
		<link>http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2209</link>
		<dc:creator>网络</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2209</guid>
		<description>那就是说，windows xp中充斥了一些无用填充字符，这些字符使得其他crc校验都失去了意义，唯独使用它自己的校验器方可。可是，微软这么做有必要仅仅为了推广一个小校验软件吗？</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>那就是说，windows xp中充斥了一些无用填充字符，这些字符使得其他crc校验都失去了意义，唯独使用它自己的校验器方可。可是，微软这么做有必要仅仅为了推广一个小校验软件吗？</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>来自：Black-Xstar</title>
		<link>http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2201</link>
		<dc:creator>Black-Xstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://applife.net/2008/09/crc-verification-utility/#comment-2201</guid>
		<description>@neekey, 一般来说，我只对比SHA1就觉得差不多了。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@neekey, 一般来说，我只对比SHA1就觉得差不多了。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
